Worth reading
51Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
9
Number of director candidatesWording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (102nd fiscal year)2026
Mar 25
Date and time(Wednesday)22 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution1 item
Agenda Item: Election of 9 directors
Company proposal only. The company states that there was no shareholder proposal.A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.
Director nominee
9Nominees
1New
4Outside
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (102nd fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m. on 25 March 2026 (Wednesday) |
| Matters for resolution | Agenda Item: Election of 9 directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | None |
| Director nominee | 9 candidates (1 new, 4 outside directors) |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.取締役全員が本総会終結時をもって任期満了となるため。各候補者について、これまでの経験・実績を活かし、取締役会の意思決定・監督機能の強化や持続的成長、企業価値向上への貢献が期待されることを理由としている。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.