Dependence on a Specific Contract Manufacturer
First written in FY2021. 1 of 3 entries say "Reframed", first in FY2024. Latest entry: FY2025.
Axxzia moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2024, 5 years after the typical company in this theme (2019).
The whole theme swung hardest in 2022: 3 of 6 companies on the "Worse" side.
2 other companies' latest entry also says "Worsened".
- FY2025WorsenedAnnual report
「In the current consolidated fiscal year, outsourcing costs paid to its main outsourced manufacturer, アピ株式会社, accounted for a high 64.6% of total outsourcing costs.」
Outsourcing costs paid to the main outsourced manufacturer, アピ株式会社, increased from 55.6% in the previous fiscal year to 64.6%, indicating greater dependence on a specific supplier. At the same time, the company cites diversification across 4 factories and the selection of other potential manufacturers as measures. - FY2024Change in the main outsourced manufacturerAnnual report
「In the current consolidated fiscal year, outsourcing costs paid to its main outsourced manufacturer, アピ株式会社, accounted for a high 55.6% of total outsourcing costs.」
The main outsourced manufacturer changed from the previously reported シーエスラボ to アピ株式会社, and outsourcing costs were disclosed at 55.6% of the total. The company also describes production diversification across アピ株式会社's 4 factories and the selection of other potential outsourcing partners. - FY2021First statedAnnual report
「The group outsources the manufacture of its products. In the current consolidated fiscal year, outsourcing costs paid to its main outsourced manufacturer, シーエスラボ, accounted for a high 55.9% of total outsourcing costs.」
The company indicates that outsourcing costs paid to its main outsourced manufacturer account for 55.9% of total outsourcing costs and identifies production and supply risks arising from natural disasters or sudden changes in the manufacturer's financial condition.