Preparation for an application to expand the indication for recurrent malignant glioma and make partial changes
First written in FY2021. 11 of 23 entries say "Advanced", first in FY2024-Q2. Latest entry: 2026-10-19.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2026AdvancedAnnual report
「For recurrent malignant glioma, we entered into agreements with Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University and Sumitomo Heavy Industries concerning a domestic Phase III clinical trial designed as a randomized comparative study of BNCT in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, establishing a framework for cooperation in the investigator-initiated clinical trial. The trial is scheduled to begin in spring 2026, and we intend to seek approval based on its results.」
For recurrent malignant glioma, cooperation agreements were signed with Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University and Sumitomo Heavy Industries for the Phase III investigator-initiated clinical trial, which is scheduled to begin in spring 2026. - FY2026-H1RestatedAnnual report
「Following the selection in March 2025 of a research and development project for a randomized, open-label, comparative study of BNCT in patients with recurrent glioblastoma proposed by Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University for AMED's public call for applications for the FY2025 Innovative Cancer Medical Research and Development Project, we decided to change our development policy to cooperate in the Phase III investigator-initiated clinical trial and seek approval based on the results of that trial.」
The policy stated in the previous fiscal year of cooperating in the AMED-selected Phase III investigator-initiated clinical trial and seeking approval based on its results continues. - FY2025ReframedAnnual report
「Following the selection of a research and development project for a randomized, open-label, comparative study of BNCT in patients with recurrent glioblastoma proposed by Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University for AMED's public call for applications for the FY2025 Innovative Cancer Medical Research and Development Project, we have decided to change our development policy to cooperate in the Phase III investigator-initiated clinical trial and seek approval based on the results of that trial.」
For recurrent malignant glioma, the policy has changed from preparing an application to cooperating in the AMED-selected Phase III investigator-initiated clinical trial and seeking approval based on its results. - FY2025-H1AdvancedAnnual report
「In September 2024, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare designated recurrent malignant glioma and recurrent meningioma as orphan diseases. We are also considering expanding the indication to newly diagnosed glioblastoma by cooperating in the investigator-initiated clinical trial launched by the University of Tsukuba.」
The company states that recurrent malignant glioma received orphan drug designation and continues to cooperate in the investigator-initiated clinical trial aimed at expanding the indication to newly diagnosed glioblastoma. - FY2024-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「We are also considering expanding the indication to newly diagnosed glioblastoma by cooperating in the investigator-initiated clinical trial planned by the University of Tsukuba.」
While reconsidering the future direction for recurrent malignant glioma, the company continues its policy of considering expansion of the indication to newly diagnosed glioblastoma through cooperation in the investigator-initiated clinical trial planned by the University of Tsukuba. - FY2024-Q2AdvancedAnnual report
「We entered into an agreement concerning the investigator-initiated Phase I clinical trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma planned by the University of Tsukuba.」
As the development direction for recurrent malignant glioma is reconsidered, concrete progress toward expanding the indication to newly diagnosed glioblastoma is described in the form of an agreement concerning an investigator-initiated Phase I clinical trial. - FY2024-Q1ReframedAnnual report
「Based on these developments, we will reconsider the future direction while also considering expanding the indication to newly diagnosed malignant glioma.」
As the future direction for recurrent malignant glioma is reconsidered following the discontinuation of the retrospective study, the description has been made more specific to include consideration of expanding the indication to newly diagnosed malignant glioma. - FY2023-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「In response to this comment, we had planned to obtain the additionally requested clinical data through a retrospective study and had continued consultations with PMDA. We have discontinued the study and will reconsider the future direction.」
The discontinuation of the retrospective study and the situation of reconsidering the future direction for recurrent malignant glioma continue. - FY2023-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「In response to this comment, we had planned to obtain the additionally requested clinical data through a retrospective study and had continued consultations with PMDA. We have discontinued the study and will reconsider the future direction.」
The discontinuation of the retrospective study and the situation of reconsidering the future direction for recurrent malignant glioma continue to be described. - FY2023-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「In response to this comment, we had planned to obtain the additionally requested clinical data through a retrospective study and had continued consultations with PMDA regarding the plan. We have now discontinued the study and will reconsider the future direction.」
The revised plan of discontinuing the retrospective study and reconsidering the future development direction for recurrent malignant glioma continues to be described. - FY2022ReframedAnnual report
「As of the filing date, we have decided to discontinue the planned retrospective study and change the development plan for recurrent malignant glioma, which had been premised on filing an application for approval based on the results of the Phase II clinical trial. Going forward, we will also consider conducting a new trial and continue developing a trial protocol in consultation with the relevant parties.」
The retrospective study has been discontinued, and the plan has changed from one premised on filing an application for approval based on the Phase II trial results to one that also considers a new trial. - FY2022-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「As a result, the one-year survival rate among 24 patients with recurrent glioblastoma was 79.2%, exceeding the prespecified expectation of 60% before the trial began. Based on these trial results, we are consulting with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency under the SAKIGAKE designation system toward filing a partial-change application. However, because survival, the primary endpoint of the trial, is affected by patient background factors such as age, tumour histology (grade) and preoperative general condition, we believe additional clinical data are needed to demonstrate efficacy after eliminating differences in these factors. We are currently continuing consultations on the possibility of seeking approval by submitting additional data from a retrospective study, among other measures.」
For recurrent malignant glioma, consultations with PMDA are continuing regarding the existing clinical results, the need for additional data and the possibility of filing an application for approval. - FY2022-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「We are currently continuing consultations on the possibility of seeking approval by submitting additional data from a retrospective study, among other measures.」
Consultations with PMDA are continuing regarding the possibility of seeking approval through the submission of additional data. - FY2022-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「We have since been consulting with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) toward filing a partial-change application and are preparing for an early filing while considering the possibility of conducting an additional clinical trial.」
The existing policy of continuing consultations with PMDA, preparing a partial-change application and considering the possibility of an additional clinical trial remains in place. - FY2021First statedAnnual report
「The Phase II clinical trial results showed a one-year survival rate of 79.2% among 24 patients with recurrent glioblastoma, exceeding the prespecified expectation of 60% before the trial began. We continue consultations with PMDA, while also preparing a trial protocol in parallel in case an additional clinical trial is required.」
A one-year survival rate of 79.2% was recorded among 24 patients, and consultations with PMDA and planning for an additional trial are progressing in parallel.