Komori
Occurring Fact4668MEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD.Information and Communications, Services and Others

Notice Regarding the Appellate Court Judgment (Company Victory)

The Intellectual Property High Court dismissed all appeals filed by 3 former area franchisees and upheld the favorable first-instance judgment for the Company. As a result, the Company is expected to recover the damages and other amounts awarded, although the specific impact on financial results has not yet been determined.

Worth reading
44Recurring
Scored from 4 of 5 sections
Direction
Improvement
Direction inferred from the company’s description.
Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.
Wording
Avoiding a definitive answer
How definitive the wording is.

Appellate Court Judgment (Victory)

Subject Entity

MEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD. (filing company)

Target Locations / Products

Meiko Juku tutoring business operations in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions, and the “Meiko Juku” trademark

Occurrence14 May 2026 (date the judgment was handed down by the Intellectual Property High Court)
Litigation / administrative action19 July 2021 (date the main action was filed) / 14 May 2026 (date the appellate judgment was handed down)
This disclosure05/15/2026
Cause

The appellants' nonpayment and underreporting of royalties, false reporting of student numbers, breach of their non-compete obligations, and unauthorized use of the “Meiko Juku” trademark after termination of the agreements

Related procedures

Type

Appeal proceedings in a lawsuit seeking an injunction against trademark infringement and other relief

Court or authority

Intellectual Property High Court

Plaintiff

MEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD.

Defendant

株式会社明光義塾九州, 株式会社明光ネットワーク九州, 株式会社アネムホールディングス

Impact on Earnings Forecast

The specific impact is currently under review and will be disclosed promptly once determined.

Outlook

The Company is expected to recover the damages and other amounts awarded at first instance. The Company will further strengthen its Meiko Juku business operations in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions.

Planned follow-up disclosure

The Company will promptly disclose the specific impact on consolidated financial results once determined.

Event that occurred
ItemDetails
Event nameAppellate Court Judgment (Victory)
Date of occurrence14 May 2026 (date the judgment was handed down by the Intellectual Property High Court)
Subject EntityMEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD. (filing company)
Target Locations / ProductsMeiko Juku tutoring business operations in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions, and the “Meiko Juku” trademark
CauseThe appellants' nonpayment and underreporting of royalties, false reporting of student numbers, breach of their non-compete obligations, and unauthorized use of the “Meiko Juku” trademark after termination of the agreements
Impact on Earnings ForecastThe specific impact is currently under review and will be disclosed promptly once determined.
Type of litigation or proceedingAppeal proceedings in a lawsuit seeking an injunction against trademark infringement and other relief
Court or authorityIntellectual Property High Court
PlaintiffMEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD.
Defendant株式会社明光義塾九州, 株式会社明光ネットワーク九州, 株式会社アネムホールディングス
Date of filing / date of action19 July 2021 (date the main action was filed) / 14 May 2026 (date the appellate judgment was handed down)
OutlookThe Company is expected to recover the damages and other amounts awarded at first instance. The Company will further strengthen its Meiko Juku business operations in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions.
Planned follow-up disclosureThe Company will promptly disclose the specific impact on consolidated financial results once determined.
Items this document does not state (12)
Date recognized / date notice receivedAmount of Impact on Business PerformanceAccounting period in which recognizedClaim amount / surcharge amountAmount of receivables at risk of non-collection or delayed collectionSuspended operationsScheduled resumption dateInvestigation structureMeasures to prevent recurrenceDirectors' and officers' liabilityVoting rights ownership percentage before the changeVoting rights ownership percentage after the change

These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.

The reasons the company gives

The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.

Although the appellants appealed the first-instance judgment, the Intellectual Property High Court dismissed all of the appeals and recognized the validity of the Company's termination of the area franchise agreements.

How to read this page

This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.
Notice Regarding the Appellate Court Judgment (Company Victory) | MEIKO NETWORK JAPAN CO.,LTD. (4668) timely disclosure | Komori