Higher costs driven by increased investment in safety equipment and an accelerated pace of vehicle additions
First written in FY2017-Q1. 3 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2017.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「On the other hand, operating profit was ¥5,112 million, up 14.7% year on year, due to higher costs resulting from an accelerated vehicle deployment pace and other factors.」
Higher costs from the accelerated vehicle deployment pace continued to be reported, but operating profit in the Mobility business rose 14.7% year on year. - FY2017-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「On the other hand, operating profit was ¥2,234 million, down 1.0% year on year, due to higher costs resulting from investment in safety equipment and an accelerated vehicle deployment pace.」
Higher costs associated with investment in safety equipment and the accelerated vehicle deployment pace continued, resulting in a 1.0% year-on-year decline in operating profit in the Mobility business. - FY2017-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「On the other hand, operating profit was ¥1,104 million, down 23.0% year on year, due to higher costs resulting from investment in safety equipment and an accelerated vehicle deployment pace.」
Higher costs associated with investment in safety equipment and the accelerated vehicle deployment pace continued, resulting in a 23.0% year-on-year decline in operating profit in the Mobility business. - FY2017-Q1MaterialisedAnnual report
「On the other hand, operating profit was ¥509 million, down 28.6% year on year, due to higher costs resulting from investment in safety equipment and an accelerated vehicle deployment pace.」
Higher costs associated with investment in safety equipment and the accelerated vehicle deployment pace were incurred, resulting in a 28.6% year-on-year decline in operating profit in the Mobility business.