Reviewing Appropriateness through the Compensation and Nomination Committee
First written in FY2018. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2024.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2022: 13 of 92 companies on the "Worse" side.
64 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2024RestatedAnnual report
「To improve transparency in executive compensation and nominations, the company has established an optional Compensation and Nomination Committee, a majority of whose members are independent outside directors.」
The company continues to use a framework under which the Board of Directors makes the decision after an optional Compensation and Nomination Committee, comprising a majority of independent outside directors, has considered its appropriateness. - FY2019RestatedAnnual report
「The directors' compensation system and basic policy are determined by the Board of Directors after the optional Compensation and Nomination Committee has first discussed their appropriateness in light of industry standards, company performance and other factors.」
The company continues to use a framework under which the Board of Directors makes the decision after the optional Compensation and Nomination Committee has considered its appropriateness. - FY2018First statedAnnual report
「The Board of Directors decides the directors’ compensation system and basic policy after the voluntary Compensation and Nomination Committee has first discussed their appropriateness in light of industry standards, company performance and other factors.」
The voluntary Compensation and Nomination Committee discusses the appropriateness of the directors’ compensation system and basic policy before the Board of Directors makes the decision.