Worth reading
58In focus
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Mixed performance
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
30
¥ million (increase in the cap on outside director compensation)Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (102nd)2026
Jun 19
Date and time25 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution2 items
Election of 9 directors
Revision of compensation for outside directors
Shareholder Proposal
Not disclosed
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee
9Nominees
1New
5Outside
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (102nd) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m. on Friday, 19 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Election of 9 directors, Proposal No. 2: Revision of compensation for outside directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | Not disclosed |
| Director nominee | 9, including 1 new candidate and 5 outside director candidates |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.If 9 directors are elected, the number of outside directors will increase by 1 to 5.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.