Worth reading
40Recurring
Scored from 4 of 5 sectionsDirection
Deterioration
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
10
Reduction rate of monthly compensation (%)Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Who is moving to which position
Resolved 22 October 2026| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Resolution date | 22 October 2026 |
Items this document does not state (20)
Scheduled Appointment DateDate of departureName of appointeeAppointee's new positionAppointee's previous positionAppointee's date of birthYear the appointee joined the CompanyNumber of shares held by the appointeeName of departing officerFormer position of departing officerNew position of departing officerReason for departureWhether the incumbent will remain in officeReason for changeReasons for appointmentNumber of directors after the changeFiling as an independent officerDetails of organizational changesChange in Corporate Governance StructureSubject to Approval by the General Meeting of Shareholders
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.To take seriously the findings of the Special Investigation Committee and clarify management's responsibility for the series of circumstances and the resulting disruption. The measure is based on a request from the individual.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.