Worth reading
55In focus
Scored from 5 of 6 sectionsDirection
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Avoiding a definitive answer
How definitive the wording is.Decision and Details
Litigation (final appeal and petition for acceptance of a final appeal)
Decision22 June 2026 (date of the notice of receipt of the case records)
ImplementationThe case was confirmed as pending before the Supreme Court as of 22 June 2026 (actual result)
Going forwardThe company will promptly disclose any matter requiring disclosure.
AmountLawsuit 1: claim amount of ¥697 million; Lawsuit 2: claim amount of ¥76 million; amounts awarded at first instance were ¥36 million in Lawsuit 1 and ¥39 million in Lawsuit 2 (in each case, excluding damages for delay)
Reason
The participating party filed a final appeal and a petition for acceptance of a final appeal because it was dissatisfied with the judgment dismissing the appeal dated 29 January 2026.
Impact on Business Performance
The company will promptly disclose any matter requiring disclosure, including any impact on its earnings forecasts.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Litigation (final appeal and petition for acceptance of a final appeal) |
| Decision Date | 22 June 2026 (date of the notice of receipt of the case records) |
| Implementation Date | The case was confirmed as pending before the Supreme Court as of 22 June 2026 (actual result) |
| Amount | Lawsuit 1: claim amount of ¥697 million; Lawsuit 2: claim amount of ¥76 million; amounts awarded at first instance were ¥36 million in Lawsuit 1 and ¥39 million in Lawsuit 2 (in each case, excluding damages for delay) |
| Impact on Business Performance | The company will promptly disclose any matter requiring disclosure, including any impact on its earnings forecasts. |
| Reason | The participating party filed a final appeal and a petition for acceptance of a final appeal because it was dissatisfied with the judgment dismissing the appeal dated 29 January 2026. |
| Governing Rule | Companies Act, Article 849, paragraph 1 |
| Related previous disclosures | “Notice Regarding the Judgment in the Lawsuit for Damages Against Former Directors of a Consolidated Subsidiary (Appellate Proceedings),” dated 30 January 2026 |
| Future plans | The company will promptly disclose any matter requiring disclosure. |
Items this document does not state (3)
Decision-Making BodyPeriod CoveredQuantity / scale
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The participating party was dissatisfied with the judgment dismissing the appeal dated 29 January 2026.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.