Komori
Other Disclosures4265Institution for a Global Society CorporationInformation and Communications, Services and Others

“Scoring bias” identified by 44% of 360-degree assessment evaluators, exposing a blind spot in the reliability of human capital data as IGS pre-releases findings on assessment bias

IGS has released preliminary findings from a survey of scoring bias among assessors in 360-degree assessments and plans to publish the 2025 edition of its Human Capital White Paper, which summarizes the analysis, on 23 June 2026. It has also begun accepting advance registrations to receive the download URL on the white paper's publication date.

Worth reading
54Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.
Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.
Scale
44
% (the proportion of 360-degree assessors whose scoring patterns deviate markedly from the average)
Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.

Announced details

GROW360+“GROW360+” Human Capital White Paper, FY2025 Edition
Applicable field (uses covered by this announcement)
Human Capital ManagementHuman resources decision-makingTalent development and deploymentHuman capital information disclosure
Launch dateScheduled for publication on Tuesday, 23 June 2026
What the company reported numerically
Quantitative Effects

Assessors who are more lenient than average: approximately 23%; assessors who are stricter than average: approximately 21%; assessors whose scoring patterns deviate markedly from the average: approximately 44%

Usage history

Cumulative GROW360+ users: approximately 360 companies and approximately 1 million assessed individuals. White paper analysis: 29 companies, 7,418 individuals, and 2,763,387 raw assessment scores. 360-degree assessors analyzed: 12,346.

Relationship between the counterparty and the company
Institution for a Global Society Corporation4265
Relationship with the Company

Professor Ono Hiroshi (小野浩) supervised the white paper. Details of the capital, personnel, and business relationships are Not disclosed.

CounterpartyProfessor Ono Hiroshi (小野浩), Hitotsubashi Business School (supervising editor)

Professor at Hitotsubashi Business School. Other information, including location, representative, capital, and year of establishment, is Not disclosed.

Registration number and expiry date

Patent registration number for the assessment-bias correction technology: 6589257. The term is Not disclosed.

Location (as indicated in this announcement)

4F, 1-11-2 Ebisu-Minami, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo

In this announcement the company addresses none of Contract Value / Offering price / Impact on Business Performance.

Announced details
ItemDetails
Names of Products / Services CoveredGROW360+, “GROW360+” Human Capital White Paper, FY2025 Edition
CounterpartyProfessor Ono Hiroshi (小野浩), Hitotsubashi Business School (supervising editor)
Counterparty overviewProfessor at Hitotsubashi Business School. Other information, including location, representative, capital, and year of establishment, is Not disclosed.
Relationship with the CompanyProfessor Ono Hiroshi (小野浩) supervised the white paper. Details of the capital, personnel, and business relationships are Not disclosed.
Launch dateScheduled for publication on Tuesday, 23 June 2026
Applicable areaHuman Capital Management, Human resources decision-making, Talent development and deployment, Human capital information disclosure
Registration number and expiry datePatent registration number for the assessment-bias correction technology: 6589257. The term is Not disclosed.
Location4F, 1-11-2 Ebisu-Minami, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
Quantitative EffectsAssessors who are more lenient than average: approximately 23%; assessors who are stricter than average: approximately 21%; assessors whose scoring patterns deviate markedly from the average: approximately 44%
Usage historyCumulative GROW360+ users: approximately 360 companies and approximately 1 million assessed individuals. White paper analysis: 29 companies, 7,418 individuals, and 2,763,387 raw assessment scores. 360-degree assessors analyzed: 12,346.
Items this document does not state (8)
Contract ValueOffering priceContract DateAward/certification nameAwarding / certifying bodyLocation scaleImpact on Business PerformanceSource

These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.

The reasons the company gives

The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.

While human capital management and human capital information disclosure are advancing, insufficient scrutiny has been given to the quality of the capability data underpinning them. The analysis empirically demonstrates the actual extent of assessment bias and the effectiveness of bias-correction technology.

How to read this page

This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.
“Scoring bias” identified by 44% of 360-degree assessment evaluators, exposing a blind spot in the reliability of human capital data as IGS pre-releases findings on assessment bias | Institution for a Global Society Corporation (4265) timely disclosure | Komori