Worth reading
64In focus
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Decision and Details
Post-event disclosure relating to an absorption-type merger in which MCP35株式会社 is the disappearing company
Decision15 June 2026 (date of execution of the absorption-type merger agreement)
Implementation15 August 2026 (effective date; completed)
AmountMerger consideration: none issued or paid; capital stock, capital reserves and retained earnings reserves: no increase; assets as of 31 March 2026: ¥7,157,464 thousand; liabilities: ¥5,063,685 thousand; net assets: ¥2,093,779 thousand
Quantity / scaleAll issued shares of MCP35株式会社 (wholly owned subsidiary); assets, liabilities and all other rights and obligations assumed
Reason
MCP35株式会社 was our wholly owned subsidiary, and the transaction was a merger without consideration between a wholly owned parent and its subsidiary.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Post-event disclosure relating to an absorption-type merger in which MCP35株式会社 is the disappearing company |
| Decision Date | 15 June 2026 (date of execution of the absorption-type merger agreement) |
| Implementation Date | 15 August 2026 (effective date; completed) |
| Amount | Merger consideration: none issued or paid; capital stock, capital reserves and retained earnings reserves: no increase; assets as of 31 March 2026: ¥7,157,464 thousand; liabilities: ¥5,063,685 thousand; net assets: ¥2,093,779 thousand |
| Quantity / scale | All issued shares of MCP35株式会社 (wholly owned subsidiary); assets, liabilities and all other rights and obligations assumed |
| Reason | MCP35株式会社 was our wholly owned subsidiary, and the transaction was a merger without consideration between a wholly owned parent and its subsidiary. |
| Governing Rule | Article 801, Paragraph 1; Article 200 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act; Article 796, Paragraph 2; Article 784, Paragraph 1; and Article 921 of the Companies Act |
Items this document does not state (5)
Decision-Making BodyPeriod CoveredImpact on Business PerformanceRelated previous disclosuresFuture plans
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.MCP35株式会社 was our wholly owned subsidiary, and the transaction was carried out as a merger without consideration between a wholly owned parent and its subsidiary.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.