Sales for this month
August 2026Fiscal year ending March 2027Monthly order intake under the upfront fixed-fee model increased year on year and was significantly higher than the year-earlier level on a cumulative basis. Under the success-fee model, both monthly and cumulative order intake decreased year on year. The numbers of registered companies and students, offers sent, offers accepted and decisions are also presented.
Increase in order intake under the upfront fixed-fee model, Increase in decisions that consumed the agreed hiring slots under the upfront fixed-fee plan, Increase in the number of active companies
Monthly trends in the previous year’s order intake and year-on-year changes for the upfront fixed-fee and success-fee models
Scope of aggregation: OfferBox business
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Month Covered | August 2026 |
| Fiscal Year Covered | Fiscal year ending March 2027 |
| Scope of aggregation | OfferBox business |
| Year-on-year change by category | Breakdown Upfront fixed-fee model: monthly order intake / Year on year 15.5, Breakdown Success-fee model: monthly order intake / Year on year -9.3 |
| Sales by category | ¥394 million, ¥68 million |
| Key KPIs | 23,231 companies, 262,179 people, 148,764 people, 1,159,410 Engagements, 1,340,743 Engagements, 14,163 Engagements, 39,656 Engagements, 7,449 people |
| Monthly Commentary | Monthly order intake under the upfront fixed-fee model increased year on year and was significantly higher than the year-earlier level on a cumulative basis. Under the success-fee model, both monthly and cumulative order intake decreased year on year. The numbers of registered companies and students, offers sent, offers accepted and decisions are also presented. |
| Factors Affecting the Change | Increase in order intake under the upfront fixed-fee model, Increase in decisions that consumed the agreed hiring slots under the upfront fixed-fee plan, Increase in the number of active companies |
| Monthly trend for the same period last year | Monthly trends in the previous year’s order intake and year-on-year changes for the upfront fixed-fee and success-fee models |
Items this document does not state (13)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Cumulative order intake under the success-fee model decreased year on year because more decisions were made that consumed the agreed hiring slots under the upfront fixed-fee plan. The increase in the number of offers sent was attributable to an increase in the number of active companies.