Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (83rd fiscal year)Election of 7 directors (excluding directors serving as Audit and Supervisory Committee Members)
Election of 5 directors serving as Audit and Supervisory Committee Members
Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation regarding the record date for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
1 shareholder, holding 5,507 voting rights, has proposed amending Article 12 of the Articles of Incorporation to change the record date for voting rights at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders from 31 March each year to 15 May each year. The Board of Directors opposes the proposal.
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (83rd fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m. on Friday, 19 June 2026 (受付開始: 9:30 a.m.) |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Election of 7 directors (excluding directors serving as Audit and Supervisory Committee Members), Proposal No. 2: Election of 5 directors serving as Audit and Supervisory Committee Members, Proposal No. 3: Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation regarding the record date for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders |
| Shareholder Proposal | 1 shareholder, holding 5,507 voting rights, has proposed amending Article 12 of the Articles of Incorporation to change the record date for voting rights at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders from 31 March each year to 15 May each year. The Board of Directors opposes the proposal. |
| Director nominee | 12 candidates. 1 new candidate and 5 outside directors. |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The company states that the candidates under its proposals are expected to contribute to enhancing corporate value and strengthening the decision-making and oversight functions of the Board of Directors by drawing on each candidate’s expertise and experience. The Board of Directors opposes the shareholder proposal as premature, citing multiple practical issues associated with changing the record date, including increased administrative workload and costs and the impact on director appointments and financial closing procedures, as well as the fact that no conclusion has been reached regarding a specific record date.