Worth reading
33Immaterial
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.The document this correction applies to
Timely disclosureNotice Regarding a Shareholder Derivative Action2026-07-28
What was corrected and how
A subsequent correction by the company to the contents of an already published filing.
Original disclosure28 July 2026
Notice Regarding a Shareholder Derivative Action
Open the original documentCorrected on the same dayCorrected on the same day as the original document (Calculated from the Original Disclosure Date Indicated in the Document)
This correction2026-07-28
Location of correction (where in the original document)
Notice Concerning Shareholder Derivative Litigation (Introduction), 2. Persons Subject to the Litigation (Defendants), and 4. Public Notice
ChangesThe date on which notice of the litigation was received was corrected from 23 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. The persons subject to the litigation were corrected from a total of 9, comprising 8 directors and 1 former director, to a total of 8, comprising 7 directors and 1 former director (however, it was confirmed that 1 other director is also subject to the litigation). The wording of the public notice was corrected in the same manner.
Reason for correction
Because part of the information provided was incorrect.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Disclosure subject to correction | Notice Regarding a Shareholder Derivative Action |
| Original disclosure date | 28 July 2026 |
| Location of correction | Notice Concerning Shareholder Derivative Litigation (Introduction), 2. Persons Subject to the Litigation (Defendants), and 4. Public Notice |
| Details of correction | The date on which notice of the litigation was received was corrected from 23 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. The persons subject to the litigation were corrected from a total of 9, comprising 8 directors and 1 former director, to a total of 8, comprising 7 directors and 1 former director (however, it was confirmed that 1 other director is also subject to the litigation). The wording of the public notice was corrected in the same manner. |
| Reason for correction | Because part of the information provided was incorrect. |
Items this document does not state (1)
Impact on Business Performance
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Because part of the information provided was incorrect.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.