Results for this period
Full year1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026Non-consolidated (standalone)Japanese GAAPThe width of the band at each stage is based on revenue. The narrower it becomes toward the bottom, the smaller the proportion of revenue that remains as profit.
The shaded area represents net assets as a proportion of total assets. It is calculated from the two amounts reported by the company.
Stacked from zero: upward is an increase in cash, downward a decrease (in ¥ thousand).The net change represented by the dotted line is the total of three items, calculated from figures provided by the company.
In the package business, development progress on large-scale projects ordered in the previous fiscal year and stronger-than-planned performance of the SaaS version contributed to results, while new orders for the one-time implementation version and additional development orders from existing users remained sluggish. In the systems integration business, unit prices, man-hours and revenue exceeded plan, but profit declined because priority was given to assigning personnel to research and development projects.
No applicable matters
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Fiscal Period Classification | Full year |
| Accounting standards | Japanese GAAP |
| Consolidated / non-consolidated | Non-consolidated (standalone) |
| Period Covered | 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026 |
| Net Sales | ¥1,386,732 thousand (YoY +0.7%) |
| Operating profit | ¥124,769 thousand (YoY +13.6%) |
| Ordinary income | ¥124,855 thousand (YoY +11.3%) |
| Profit attributable to owners of the parent | ¥102,239 thousand (YoY +11.3%) |
| Net income per share | ¥22.40 |
| Total assets | ¥2,418,833 thousand |
| Net assets | ¥1,789,316 thousand |
| Cash flows from operating activities | ¥95,810 thousand |
| Cash flows from investing activities | ¥-114,193 thousand |
| Cash flows from financing activities | ¥-27,378 thousand |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | ¥408,288 thousand |
| Full-year earnings forecast | Net Sales ¥1,447 million (YoY +4.3%) / Operating profit ¥127 million (YoY +1.8%) / Ordinary income ¥144 million (YoY +15.3%) / Net income ¥105 million (YoY +2.7%) |
| Segment revenue | Package Business ¥735,897 thousand (YoY +1.3%), Systems Integration business ¥650,835 thousand (YoY 0.0%) |
| Segment profit | Package Business ¥347,094 thousand (YoY +7.5%), Systems Integration business ¥139,975 thousand (YoY -9.2%) |
| Regional sales | Outside Japan No sales to external customers outside Japan |
| Depreciation and amortization | ¥11,170 thousand |
| Impairment loss | No impairment loss was recognized during the fiscal year (no impairment loss was applicable to any reportable segment). |
| Disclosure regarding the going concern assumption | No applicable matters |
| Change in accounting policy | Changes due to revisions to standards No / Other changes No / Change in accounting estimate No / Restatement No |
| Material subsequent events | No applicable matters. |
| Factors Behind Changes in Business Performance | In the package business, development progress on large-scale projects ordered in the previous fiscal year and stronger-than-planned performance of the SaaS version contributed to results, while new orders for the one-time implementation version and additional development orders from existing users remained sluggish. In the systems integration business, unit prices, man-hours and revenue exceeded plan, but profit declined because priority was given to assigning personnel to research and development projects. |
Items this document does not state (13)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Development progress on large-scale projects ordered in the previous fiscal year and stronger-than-planned performance of the SaaS version contributed to the package business. However, new orders for the one-time implementation version and additional development orders from existing users remained sluggish, while the systems integration business prioritized allocating personnel to research and development projects.