Recommendation for an Order to Pay a Surcharge Following Prior-Period Corrections
First written in FY2019. . Latest entry: FY2020.
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Other".
- FY2020Recognition of surcharge as an extraordinary loss finalizedAnnual report
「Because the company received external indications of inappropriate accounting treatment in prior-period results and, among other things, recognized ¥6 million in administrative monetary penalties as an extraordinary loss,」
The full-year results confirm that a ¥6,000 thousand surcharge related to corrections to prior-year filings was recognized as an extraordinary loss for the current period. - FY2020-Q1Recognition of a Surcharge as an Extraordinary LossAnnual report
「As a result of the recognition of a ¥6 million surcharge as an extraordinary loss and other effects,」
The company reports that a ¥6 million surcharge related to corrections to prior-year filings was recognized as an extraordinary loss. - FY2019First statedAnnual report
「It was announced that, in connection with corrections to the securities reports and other filings submitted by the company on 8 March 2019, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission on 21 June 2019 recommended to the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency, pursuant to Article 20, Paragraph 1 of the Act for Establishment of the Financial Services Agency, that an order be issued requiring the company to pay a surcharge of ¥6 million.」
The company newly reports, as a material subsequent event, the fact that the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission recommended issuing an order requiring payment of a ¥6 million surcharge in connection with corrections to prior-year securities reports and other filings.