Governance structure
voting rights ratio: 16.3%) and Internet Research Institute Ltd (indirect ownership; voting rights ratio: 16.3%). Both are classified as other affiliated companies.
When one company holds most of the voting rights, its wishes are more likely to prevail in management. How the interests of minority shareholders are protected is a key issue.
No changes are planned to the company’s future position within the corporate group or to its other relationships with the parent company, etc.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Controlling shareholder | 株式会社インターネット総合研究所 (voting rights ratio: 16.3%) and Internet Research Institute Ltd (indirect ownership; voting rights ratio: 16.3%). Both are classified as other affiliated companies. |
| Changes this time | No changes are planned to the company’s future position within the corporate group or to its other relationships with the parent company, etc. |
Items this document does not state (6)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Directors hold concurrent positions in order to strengthen the relationship with 株式会社インターネット総合研究所, receive management support from a shareholder’s perspective, and apply to the company’s management the experience and specialized knowledge developed at that company and other group companies. The company explains that a certain degree of independence is secured because its business activities are not restricted and its independent management decisions are not impeded.