Worth reading
48Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
356000000
¥Wording
Conditional
How definitive the wording is.Decision and Details
Receipt of a demand letter requesting that an action be filed against a director
Decision29 October 2026 (date of the demand letter) / 30 October 2026 (date received)
Going forwardThe company's audit & supervisory board members will investigate the contents of the demand letter and consider the appropriate response. Once the company decides whether to file an action seeking to pursue liability, it will announce the decision promptly.
Amount¥356 million plus late-payment damages (the amount for which the shareholder is requesting that an action be filed)
Reason
The shareholder claims that, with respect to losses incurred by the company as a result of misconduct by a former employee, the president and representative director at the time breached his duty to establish an internal control system.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Receipt of a demand letter requesting that an action be filed against a director |
| Decision Date | 29 October 2026 (date of the demand letter) / 30 October 2026 (date received) |
| Amount | ¥356 million plus late-payment damages (the amount for which the shareholder is requesting that an action be filed) |
| Reason | The shareholder claims that, with respect to losses incurred by the company as a result of misconduct by a former employee, the president and representative director at the time breached his duty to establish an internal control system. |
| Related previous disclosures | 14 August 2025: “Regarding misconduct by a former employee of the company” |
| Future plans | The company's audit & supervisory board members will investigate the contents of the demand letter and consider the appropriate response. Once the company decides whether to file an action seeking to pursue liability, it will announce the decision promptly. |
Items this document does not state (6)
Decision-Making BodyImplementation DatePeriod CoveredQuantity / scaleImpact on Business PerformanceGoverning Rule
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The shareholder claims that the company suffered losses as a result of misconduct by a former employee and that the president and representative director at the time breached his duty to establish an internal control system.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.