Arrest of Former Employee
Former employee of the company (already dismissed for disciplinary reasons)
The former employee engaged in misconduct over several years, including misappropriating company funds through fictitious work orders.
Related procedures
Arrest on suspicion of breach of trust, acceptance of a criminal complaint, and investigation by the investigative authorities
Investigative authorities (specific name not disclosed)
Company response
Expanding internal compliance education and training, improving internal controls in the approval process for transactions and payments involving external vendors, and strengthening monitoring by the internal audit function
The company will fully cooperate with the investigative authorities in their efforts to determine the full scope of the matter. It will continue to ensure the thorough implementation of measures to prevent recurrence.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Arrest of Former Employee |
| Date of occurrence | 8 July 2026 |
| Subject Entity | Former employee of the company (already dismissed for disciplinary reasons) |
| Cause | The former employee engaged in misconduct over several years, including misappropriating company funds through fictitious work orders. |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | Arrest on suspicion of breach of trust, acceptance of a criminal complaint, and investigation by the investigative authorities |
| Court or authority | Investigative authorities (specific name not disclosed) |
| Date of filing / date of action | 8 July 2026 (date of arrest) / 3 October 2025 (date the criminal complaint was accepted) |
| Measures to prevent recurrence | Expanding internal compliance education and training, improving internal controls in the approval process for transactions and payments involving external vendors, and strengthening monitoring by the internal audit function |
| Outlook | The company will fully cooperate with the investigative authorities in their efforts to determine the full scope of the matter. It will continue to ensure the thorough implementation of measures to prevent recurrence. |
Items this document does not state (16)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The former employee engaged in misconduct, including misappropriating company funds through fictitious work orders. The company had refrained from disclosing that the criminal complaint had been accepted, taking into consideration the potential impact on the investigation.