The document this correction applies to
Timely disclosureWhat was corrected and how
A subsequent correction by the company to the contents of an already published filing.
Notice Concerning the Financial Results of an Unlisted Parent Company
Open the original document“Status of Officers” in 2. Shareholding by Type of Shareholder, Status of Major Shareholders and Status of Officers of the Parent Company, etc.
5 male and 2 female officers (female officers accounted for 28.6% of all officers). Outside director (Audit Committee member): I Dofa
4 male and 3 female officers (female officers accounted for 42.9% of all officers). Outside director (Audit Committee member): John Hansem
The Company was informed by its unlisted parent company, etc. that a change in the officers had not been reflected in the “Status of Officers” section.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Disclosure subject to correction | Notice Concerning the Financial Results of an Unlisted Parent Company |
| Original disclosure date | 24 April 2026 |
| Location of correction | “Status of Officers” in 2. Shareholding by Type of Shareholder, Status of Major Shareholders and Status of Officers of the Parent Company, etc. |
| Details of correction | 5 male and 2 female officers (female officers accounted for 28.6% of all officers). Outside director (Audit Committee member): I Dofa → 4 male and 3 female officers (female officers accounted for 42.9% of all officers). Outside director (Audit Committee member): John Hansem |
| Reason for correction | The Company was informed by its unlisted parent company, etc. that a change in the officers had not been reflected in the “Status of Officers” section. |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company was informed that a change in the officers of the unlisted parent company, etc. had not been reflected in the “Status of Officers” section.