Brand damage caused by misconduct at stores or similar trade names
First written in FY2017-Q3. 5 of 6 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2018.
No other company in this theme has enough history to compare yet.
- FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「However, if any misconduct occurs at a store, resulting in circumstances that adversely affect the brand, or if a third party uses a similar trade name or other designation and the brand’s value is impaired, the Group’s performance may be affected.」
The Group is reiterating the risk of brand damage resulting from misconduct at licensed stores or the use of similar trade names by third parties. - FY2018-Q3RestatedAnnual report
「During the cumulative third quarter, there were no material changes concerning the occurrence of matters that could have a material impact on investors' decisions among the matters relating to the business and financial conditions described in the quarterly report, or concerning the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The Group states that there have been no material changes to its existing risks, including brand damage caused by misconduct at stores or similar trade names. - FY2018-Q2RestatedAnnual report
「During the cumulative second quarter under review, there were no significant changes in the matters described in this quarterly report regarding the business and accounting conditions that could materially affect investors’ decisions, or in the “Business and Other Risks” described in the securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The Group states that there have been no material changes to its existing risks, including brand damage caused by misconduct at stores or similar trade names. - FY2018-Q1RestatedAnnual report
「During the cumulative first quarter, there were no material changes concerning the occurrence of matters that could have a material impact on investors' decisions among the matters relating to the business and financial conditions described in the quarterly report, or concerning the business and other risks described in the annual securities report for the previous fiscal year.」
The Group states that there have been no material changes to its existing risks, including brand damage caused by misconduct at stores or similar trade names. - FY2017RestatedAnnual report
「If any misconduct occurs at a store, resulting in circumstances that adversely affect the brand, or if a third party uses a similar trade name or other designation and the brand’s value is impaired, the Group’s performance may be affected.」
The Group is reiterating the risk of brand damage resulting from misconduct at licensed stores or the use of similar trade names by third parties. - FY2017-Q3First statedAnnual report
「However, if misconduct at a store results in circumstances that adversely affect the brand, or if a third party uses a similar trade name or other designation and the brand’s value is impaired, the Group’s performance may be affected.」
In connection with expanding its store network through license agreements with franchisees, the Group has newly described the possibility that misconduct at stores or the use of similar trade names by third parties could affect brand value and performance.