Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (98th fiscal year)Appropriation of surplus
Approval of the absorption-type company split agreement
Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
Election of 4 directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee Members
Election of 2 directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members
Election of 1 substitute director who is an Audit & Supervisory Committee Member
Determination of compensation for granting restricted stock to directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee Members
Determination of compensation for granting restricted stock to directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members
There are no shareholder proposals
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (98th fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, 25 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal 1: Appropriation of surplus, Proposal No. 2: Approval of the absorption-type company split agreement, Proposal No. 3: Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, Proposal No. 4: Election of 4 directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, Proposal No. 5: Election of 2 directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, Proposal No. 6: Election of 1 substitute director who is an Audit & Supervisory Committee Member, Proposal No. 7: Determination of compensation for granting restricted stock to directors who are not Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, Proposal No. 8: Determination of compensation for granting restricted stock to directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members |
| Shareholder Proposal | There are no shareholder proposals |
| Director nominee | There are 7 candidates in total: 4 under Proposal No. 4, 2 under Proposal No. 5 and 1 under Proposal No. 6. There are 5 new candidates. There are 2 outside director candidates: Matsuura Minoru (松浦 稔) under Proposal No. 5 and Takikawa Yoshio (滝川 好夫) under Proposal No. 6. |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The transition to a holding company structure is intended to clarify the authority and responsibilities of operating companies, accelerate decision-making, strengthen governance through the concentration of administrative functions, and enhance corporate value. Restricted stock compensation is intended to provide incentives for sustained enhancement of corporate value or prevention of its impairment, and to share value with shareholders.