Decision and Details
Rejection of a shareholder proposal at the 21st Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
The Individual Shareholder Notice arrived at the Company on 1 May 2026, after the deadline for exercising shareholder proposal rights, and the required procedures had not been completed by that deadline. The Company therefore determined that the requirements for exercising shareholder proposal rights had not been met and that the proposal was unlawful.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Rejection of a shareholder proposal at the 21st Annual General Meeting of Shareholders |
| Decision Date | 12 May 2026 (disclosure date; decision date Not disclosed) |
| Implementation Date | Rejected (already implemented; date Not disclosed) |
| Period Covered | Shareholder proposal concerning the 21st Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, scheduled for 25 June 2026 |
| Reason | The Individual Shareholder Notice arrived at the Company on 1 May 2026, after the deadline for exercising shareholder proposal rights, and the required procedures had not been completed by that deadline. The Company therefore determined that the requirements for exercising shareholder proposal rights had not been met and that the proposal was unlawful. |
| Governing Rule | Article 303, Paragraph 2 of the Companies Act; Article 305, Paragraph 1 of the Companies Act; Article 154, Paragraph 2 of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds and Shares |
| Future plans | The Company will uphold corporate governance based on the Companies Act, related laws and regulations, and its internal rules, and will continue to address the matter. The Company will promptly disclose any matters requiring disclosure. |
Items this document does not state (5)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Individual Shareholder Notice arrived at the Company after the deadline for exercising shareholder proposal rights. The Company determined that the proposal was unlawful because it did not meet the requirements under the Companies Act and related laws and regulations.