Governance structure
This is the number of people reported to the exchange as independent officers. Whether someone is an outside officer and whether they qualify as independent are separate determinations.
The Company conducted an evaluation of the Board of Directors' effectiveness and assessed that its effectiveness was generally ensured. As areas for improvement, it identified enhancing deliberations on the management plan and reviewing the evaluation and compensation system for directors and executive officers.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Number of directors | Of the 9 directors covered, 6 are independent outside directors (the total number of directors and the number of outside directors: Not disclosed) |
| Number of independent officers | 6 (of the 9 directors covered, 6 are independent outside directors) |
| Changes this time | The Company conducted an evaluation of the Board of Directors' effectiveness and assessed that its effectiveness was generally ensured. As areas for improvement, it identified enhancing deliberations on the management plan and reviewing the evaluation and compensation system for directors and executive officers. |
Items this document does not state (5)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company analyzed and evaluated the Board of Directors' effectiveness based on the Tokyo Stock Exchange's Corporate Governance Code. It identified enhancing deliberations on the management plan and reviewing the evaluation and compensation system for directors and executive officers as areas for future improvement.