Risk of Brand Damage Caused by Adverse Publicity and Officer and Employee Misconduct
First written in FY2025. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2026.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 4 of 29 companies on the "Worse" side.
72 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2026RestatedAnnual report
「As measures to address this risk, the company coordinates on a routine basis with external specialists such as lawyers, in preparation for appropriate media responses to issues affecting its reputation and responses to inappropriate posts, and has clarified response processes and responsibilities in advance.」
The company continues to address the risk of brand damage due to reputational issues or misconduct by officers and employees through external specialists and response processes. - FY2026-H1RestatedAnnual report
「During the six months ended June, there were no new business or other risks, nor any material changes to the business or other risks described in the securities report for the prior fiscal year.」
The risk of brand damage due to reputational issues or misconduct by officers and employees is treated as having undergone no material change. - FY2025First statedAnnual report
「If negative rumors about the company or its officers and employees arise and circulate through media reports, social media posts or other channels, the company's brand image and social credibility could decline.」
The company is addressing this by coordinating with external specialists such as lawyers and clarifying response processes and responsibilities.