Worth reading
70In focus
Scored from 1 of 5 sectionsDirection
Improvement
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
3
Committee membersWording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Governance structure
Committee2
任意の指名報酬委員会：社外委員の割合は過半数（委員3名複数の独立社外取締役を含む）
Changes this time
取締役会の諮問機関として任意の指名報酬委員会を設置することを決議。2026年2月1日に設置し、委員3名、社外取締役過半数とする。
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Committee | 任意の指名報酬委員会：社外委員の割合は過半数（委員3名、複数の独立社外取締役を含む） |
| Changes this time | 取締役会の諮問機関として任意の指名報酬委員会を設置することを決議。2026年2月1日に設置し、委員3名、社外取締役過半数とする。 |
Items this document does not state (6)
Corporate Governance StructureNumber of directorsNumber of independent officersPolicy on cross-shareholdingsTakeover defensesControlling shareholder
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.取締役および執行役員の指名・報酬決定などに関するプロセスの独立性・客観性・説明責任を強化し、コーポレートガバナンスをより充実させるため。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.