Risks Related to Continuing Partnership Agreements with Overseas Chefs and Brand Damage
First written in FY2017. 3 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2020: 8 of 42 companies on the "Worse" side.
50 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「If, for any reason, the Group becomes unable to continue the agreements with overseas chefs underlying the brands operated by the Group, this could affect the Group’s financial results.」
The risk of an impact on the brand and financial results resulting from the inability to continue partnership agreements with overseas chefs continued to be disclosed. - FY2019RestatedAnnual report
「If, for any reason, the Group becomes unable to continue the agreements with overseas chefs underlying the brands operated by the Group, this could affect the Group’s financial results.」
The risk of an impact on the brand and financial results if partnership agreements with overseas chefs could not be continued was reiterated in the full-year disclosure. - FY2018RestatedAnnual report
「If, for any reason, the Group becomes unable to continue the agreements with overseas chefs underlying the brands operated by the Group, this could affect the Group’s financial results.」
The risk of an impact on the brand and financial results if partnership agreements with overseas chefs could not be continued continued to be disclosed. - FY2017First statedAnnual report
「If, for any reason, the Group becomes unable to continue the agreements with overseas chefs underlying the brands operated by the Group, this could affect the Group’s financial results.」
The risk of an impact on the brand and financial results if partnership agreements with overseas chefs could no longer be continued was explicitly identified for the first time.