Contents of this document
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Document type | Summary of Q&A |
| Fiscal Period Covered | Fiscal year ended February 2026 |
| Self-assessment against the plan | Operating profit below plan; net income varied from the revised plan |
| Key KPIs | Same-store sales below 100% year on year; customer traffic below the prior-year level; average spend per customer not disclosed |
| Unit price and quantity metrics | Customer traffic × average spend per customer |
| Assumptions Underlying the Business Outlook | Existing stores assumed to remain below the prior-year level; emphasis on profit contributions from new store openings |
| Payout ratio | Aiming for a payout ratio of 40%, considered appropriate, from the current level, which is well above 40% |
| Key points of the Q&A | Reasons for the delayed earnings recovery and assumptions underlying the current fiscal year’s budget, same-store sales, dual-brand signage and Unlimited Rice, dynamic pricing, M&A, talent development and organizational integration, inbound tourism, shareholder benefits and dividends, and share price and corporate value |
| New initiatives | 壱角家 (Ichikakuya) Unlimited Rice campaign, two-brand signage at one location, dynamic pricing, consideration of introducing automated cooking equipment, use of social media and the company’s proprietary brand app, refreshed signage for inbound tourists, cashless payments at all stores, and expansion of the shareholder benefit program |
Items this document does not state (22)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The company cited sluggish customer traffic following the 2024 price revisions, intensifying competition from other business formats in prime locations near train stations, and delays in responding to external conditions as the main reasons for the delayed earnings recovery and same-store sales falling below the prior-year level. It also explained that the main reason for the variance between net income and the plan was the recognition of impairment losses on a conservative basis following discussions with the audit firm.