Worth reading
37Immaterial
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Deterioration
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Avoiding a definitive answer
How definitive the wording is.Regarding an On-Site Inspection by the Japan Fair Trade Commission of Our Consolidated Subsidiary
Subject Entity
株式会社ベッツ・チョイス・ジャパン (our consolidated subsidiary)
Occurrence20 October 2026 (the date of the on-site inspection)
This disclosure10/20/2026
Cause
Suspected violation of the Antimonopoly Act (resale price maintenance)
Related procedures
Type
On-site inspection
Court or authority
Japan Fair Trade Commission
Outlook
We will cooperate fully with the Japan Fair Trade Commission's inspection.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Regarding an On-Site Inspection by the Japan Fair Trade Commission of Our Consolidated Subsidiary |
| Date of occurrence | 20 October 2026 (the date of the on-site inspection) |
| Subject Entity | 株式会社ベッツ・チョイス・ジャパン (our consolidated subsidiary) |
| Cause | Suspected violation of the Antimonopoly Act (resale price maintenance) |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | On-site inspection |
| Court or authority | Japan Fair Trade Commission |
| Outlook | We will cooperate fully with the Japan Fair Trade Commission's inspection. |
Items this document does not state (18)
Date recognized / date notice receivedTarget Locations / ProductsAmount of Impact on Business PerformanceAccounting period in which recognizedImpact on Earnings ForecastPlaintiffDefendantDate of filing / date of actionClaim amount / surcharge amountAmount of receivables at risk of non-collection or delayed collectionSuspended operationsScheduled resumption dateInvestigation structureMeasures to prevent recurrenceDirectors' and officers' liabilityVoting rights ownership percentage before the changeVoting rights ownership percentage after the changePlanned follow-up disclosure
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Because the subsidiary is suspected of violating the Antimonopoly Act (resale price maintenance).
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.