Governance structure
The company stated that it had material weaknesses requiring disclosure in its internal control over financial reporting and that its internal control was ineffective. As its corrective policy, it outlined correcting deficiencies in access management, establishing a monitoring framework overseen by the Information Security Committee, and conducting Fit & Gap analysis.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Committee | Information Security Committee (percentage of outside members: Not disclosed) |
| Changes this time | The company stated that it had material weaknesses requiring disclosure in its internal control over financial reporting and that its internal control was ineffective. As its corrective policy, it outlined correcting deficiencies in access management, establishing a monitoring framework overseen by the Information Security Committee, and conducting Fit & Gap analysis. |
Items this document does not state (6)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.Operational management under the regulations governing information systems and information security in the Japan region, particularly access management, had not been adequately implemented. This led to system disruptions caused by a cyberattack and delays in obtaining and verifying data related to financial reporting.