Demae-Can (2484) · RiskDropped
Rising Telemarketing Customer Acquisition Costs and Profitability Falling Short of Plan
First written in FY2016-Q3. 1 of 2 entries say "Materialised", first in FY2016-Q3. Latest entry: FY2016.
2entries
1years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Revenue risks from customer acquisition, retention, churn and ARPU shortfallsA theme 67 companies write about · 66 as a headwind · 2 as a tailwind
Demae-Can moved to the "Worse" side of this theme in 2016, 9 years before the typical company in this theme (2025).
0 other companies' latest entry also says "Dropped".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 67 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 67.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2016DroppedAnnual reportThe current filing contains no specific description corresponding to the excess telemarketing customer acquisition costs and failure to meet the profitability plan described in the previous filing.
- FY2016-Q3MaterialisedAnnual report
「Profitability fell below plan because customer acquisition costs from telemarketing were higher than expected.」
The filing states that customer acquisition costs exceeded expectations and profitability fell short of plan. No specific cost amount was provided.