Business Continuity Risk from Revocation of Designation as a Long-Term Care Insurance Service Provider
First written in FY2017. 3 of 4 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2025.
4 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2025RestatedAnnual report
「The Group currently has not experienced any event falling under these grounds for revocation of the designation. If such an event were to occur, the designation would be revoked, which could affect the continuation of the Group’s businesses.」
The company continues to identify business continuity risk from revocation of its designation as a long-term care insurance provider, while stating that no event falling under the grounds for revocation has occurred at present. - FY2024RestatedAnnual report
「The Group currently has not experienced any event falling under these grounds for revocation of the designation. If such an event were to occur, the designation would be revoked, which could affect the continuation of the Group’s businesses.」
The company continues to disclose the business continuity risk from revocation of its designation as a long-term care insurance provider, while stating that no event falling under the grounds for revocation has occurred at present. - FY2023RestatedAnnual report
「The Group currently has not experienced any event falling under these grounds for revocation of the designation. If such an event were to occur, the designation would be revoked, which could affect the continuation of the Group’s businesses.」
The company continues to disclose the business continuity risk from revocation of its designation as a long-term care insurance provider, while stating that no event falling under the grounds for revocation has occurred at present. - FY2017First statedAnnual report
「If an event falling under the grounds for revocation of the designation were to occur, the designation would be revoked, which could affect the continuation of the Group’s businesses.」
The company identifies violations of facility and staffing requirements, fraudulent billing, false reporting and refusal to undergo inspections, among others, as grounds for revocation of the designation, and cites their potential impact on business continuity as a risk.