Worth reading
52Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
2
peopleWording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (84th)2026年
3月30日
Date and time（月曜日）午前10時24 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution1 item
Proposal for the election of 2 directors
Shareholder Proposal
No
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee
2Nominees
2New
2Outside
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (84th) |
| Date and time | 2026年3月30日（月曜日）午前10時 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal for the election of 2 directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | No |
| Director nominee | 2名（新任2名、社外2名） |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.取締役南浩二氏及び貝沼利晃氏が総会終結時をもって辞任により退任するため、取締役2名を補欠選任する。候補者については、食料事業の経験、国際的視点、専門的見識などを経営全般に活かし、経営体制を強化するためとしている。
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.