Worth reading
42Recurring
Scored from 4 of 5 sectionsDirection
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Finalization of judgment in litigation
Subject Entity
Kitahama Capital Partners Co.,Ltd.
Occurrence25 June 2026 (the date on which the plaintiff expressed its intention to withdraw the appeal and the first-instance judgment became final)
Same dayAwareness or receipt of notice25 June 2026 (the date on which the plaintiff expressed its intention to withdraw the appeal)
This disclosure07/02/2026
Related procedures
Type
Damages lawsuit
Court or authority
Tokyo District Court
Plaintiff
Ikeda Kiyoshi (池田清志)
Defendant
Kitahama Capital Partners Co.,Ltd.
Amount of Impact on Business Performance
No impact (the matter will have no impact on the Company’s financial results)
Outlook
The first-instance judgment has become final, and the litigation has concluded
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Finalization of judgment in litigation |
| Date of occurrence | 25 June 2026 (the date on which the plaintiff expressed its intention to withdraw the appeal and the first-instance judgment became final) |
| Date recognized / date notice received | 25 June 2026 (the date on which the plaintiff expressed its intention to withdraw the appeal) |
| Subject Entity | Kitahama Capital Partners Co.,Ltd. |
| Amount of Impact on Business Performance | No impact (the matter will have no impact on the Company’s financial results) |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | Damages lawsuit |
| Court or authority | Tokyo District Court |
| Plaintiff | Ikeda Kiyoshi (池田清志) |
| Defendant | Kitahama Capital Partners Co.,Ltd. |
| Outlook | The first-instance judgment has become final, and the litigation has concluded |
Items this document does not state (15)
Target Locations / ProductsCauseAccounting period in which recognizedImpact on Earnings ForecastDate of filing / date of actionClaim amount / surcharge amountAmount of receivables at risk of non-collection or delayed collectionSuspended operationsScheduled resumption dateInvestigation structureMeasures to prevent recurrenceDirectors' and officers' liabilityVoting rights ownership percentage before the changeVoting rights ownership percentage after the changePlanned follow-up disclosure
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company states that the first-instance judgment became final because the plaintiff withdrew the appeal. It also states that the matter will have no impact on the Company’s financial results.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.