Reputational and Business Performance Risk from Information Leaks and Inadequate Personal Information Protection Management
First written in FY2018. 2 of 3 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2022.
The whole theme swung hardest in 2026: 13 of 71 companies on the "Worse" side.
129 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
- FY2022RestatedAnnual report
「The Group obtained ISMS (Information Security Management System) certification in September 2009 and P-Mark (PrivacyMark) certification in January 2012, and takes the utmost care in protecting personal information. However, if a non-conformity with a contract arises in personal information protection management, the social credibility and performance of the Group could be affected.」
While indicating that management is supported by ISMS and PrivacyMark certifications, it continues to identify the risk that deficiencies in personal information protection management could affect credibility and performance. - FY2021RestatedAnnual report
「The Group obtained ISMS (Information Security Management System) certification in September 2009 and P-Mark (PrivacyMark) certification in January 2012, and takes the utmost care in protecting personal information. However, if a deficiency arises in personal information protection management, the social credibility and performance of the Group could be affected.」
While indicating that management is supported by ISMS and PrivacyMark certifications, it continues to identify the risk that deficiencies in personal information protection management could affect credibility and performance. - FY2018First statedAnnual report
「However, if a deficiency arises in personal information protection management, the social credibility and performance of the Group could be affected.」
On the premise that the Group has obtained ISMS and PrivacyMark certifications, it explicitly identifies the impact of deficiencies in personal information protection management on social credibility and performance as a risk.