Worth reading
53Recurring
0–100. This measures how worthwhile something is to read, not how good or bad the company is.Direction
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
7
Number of director candidatesWording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (84th fiscal year)2026
Jun 18
Date and time(Thursday), 10:00 a.m.26 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution2 items
Appropriation of surplus
Election of 7 Directors
Shareholder Proposal
No
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee
7Nominees
3New
4Outside
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (84th fiscal year) |
| Date and time | 18 June 2026 (Thursday), 10:00 a.m. |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal 1: Appropriation of surplus, Proposal No. 2: Election of 7 Directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | No |
| Director nominee | 7 (3 new, 4 outside) |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The appropriation of surplus is based on the basic policy of maintaining stable dividends while taking performance into account. The increase in the number of directors is intended to ensure management transparency and further strengthen corporate governance.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.