Worth reading
42Recurring
Scored from 3 of 4 sectionsDirection
Neutral
Direction inferred from the company’s description.Scale
—
Displayed only when the document provides numerical figures.Wording
Definitive
How definitive the wording is.Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (72nd term)2026
Jun 19
Date and time21 days from this disclosure to the meeting
Matters for resolution2 items
Appropriation of surplus
Election of 8 directors
Shareholder Proposal
No
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.Director nominee8 (number of new and outside directors: Not disclosed)
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (72nd term) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m. on Friday, 19 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal 1: Appropriation of surplus, Proposal 2: Election of 8 directors |
| Shareholder Proposal | No |
| Director nominee | 8 (number of new and outside directors: Not disclosed) |
Items this document does not state (1)
Percentage voting in favor
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The stock split was undertaken to lower the investment amount per unit, broaden the investor base and improve share liquidity.
How to read this page
This is not the documentKomori reads the disclosure the company filed and writes this summary. Figures are as stated by the company and are not audited.
Weight is not a verdictIt measures how much this changes what the company had already told the market. It is not a view on the shares.
Corrections happenIf the company reissues this disclosure, the page is rebuilt from the corrected version and the revision number moves up.