Resolutions for the General Meeting of Shareholders
Annual (23rd)Disposition of surplus
Election of 5 directors, excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members
Election of 1 outside director who is not an Audit and Supervisory Committee member
Proposal by Oasis Japan Strategic Fund Y Ltd. to elect Okada Masaharu (岡田雅晴) as an outside director who is not an Audit and Supervisory Committee member. The Board of Directors opposes the proposal.
A shareholder proposal is a resolution submitted by a shareholder, rather than by the company.| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of shareholders' meeting | Annual (23rd) |
| Date and time | 10:00 a.m., Friday, 26 June 2026 |
| Matters for resolution | Proposal No. 1: Disposition of surplus, Proposal No. 2: Election of 5 directors, excluding directors who are Audit & Supervisory Committee Members, Proposal No. 3: Election of 1 outside director who is not an Audit and Supervisory Committee member |
| Shareholder Proposal | Proposal by Oasis Japan Strategic Fund Y Ltd. to elect Okada Masaharu (岡田雅晴) as an outside director who is not an Audit and Supervisory Committee member. The Board of Directors opposes the proposal. |
| Director nominee | 5, including 2 new candidates and 1 outside director |
Items this document does not state (1)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The year-end dividend was determined based on a policy of maintaining stable and continuous dividends while also taking earnings performance into consideration, with the company comprehensively considering its earnings performance, payout ratio and other factors. The reasons given for the director candidates include their experience in corporate management and business and management administration, as well as their character and insight. The reasons given for opposing the shareholder proposal include its inconsistency with the direction of the company's governance reforms, its incompatibility with the management experience required of directors of a pure holding company, and the lack of necessity for adding another candidate.