Decision and Details
Tokyo District CourtA provisional disposition confirming that the Company's directors hold office as directors of the Company and that Sanaida Naoyuki (左奈田直幸) holds office as the Company's representative director
Because the Company believes that the resolutions to remove the Company's directors and appoint the director candidates proposed by Mae (前氏) violate applicable laws and regulations and the Articles of Incorporation, and are nonexistent, invalid, or should be rescinded
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | A provisional disposition confirming that the Company's directors hold office as directors of the Company and that Sanaida Naoyuki (左奈田直幸) holds office as the Company's representative director |
| Decision-Making Body | Tokyo District Court |
| Decision Date | 22 June 2026 |
| Implementation Date | Decision made on 22 June 2026 (provisional confirmation of status under the provisional disposition) |
| Period Covered | The period of dispute until the court's final determination (specific period: Not disclosed) |
| Quantity / scale | 7 director candidates proposed by Mae (前) |
| Reason | Because the Company believes that the resolutions to remove the Company's directors and appoint the director candidates proposed by Mae (前氏) violate applicable laws and regulations and the Articles of Incorporation, and are nonexistent, invalid, or should be rescinded |
| Governing Rule | Laws and regulations and the Articles of Incorporation (specific provisions: Not disclosed) |
| Related previous disclosures | Notice Regarding the Resolutions of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders and the Company's Response dated 12 May 2026 |
| Future plans | In the court proceedings, the Company will seek a final determination that the resolution to remove the Company's directors violates applicable laws and regulations and the Articles of Incorporation, and is nonexistent, invalid, or should be rescinded. If any matter requiring disclosure arises, the Company will make a timely disclosure without delay. |
Items this document does not state (2)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company sought confirmation of the status of its directors and representative director because it believes that the resolutions to remove the Company's directors and appoint the director candidates proposed by Mae (前氏) violate applicable laws and regulations and the Articles of Incorporation, and are nonexistent, invalid, or should be rescinded.