Company's Opinion on a Shareholder's Request to Convene an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders
SAAFホールディングス株式会社
The Company considers that Mae (前)'s request seeks to make the election of more directors than the Company's prescribed number of directors (7) an agenda item for the general meeting of shareholders. The Tokyo District Court approved a decision provisionally determining that the director candidates proposed by Mae (前) do not hold the positions of director or representative director of the Company.
Related procedures
Application for a provisional disposition concerning confirmation of status and objection to the preservation order
Tokyo District Court
The Company will carefully review the contents of the request, disclose its response policy once determined, and hold its 8th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on 29 June 2026.
The Company will disclose its response to this demand once its policy has been determined.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Event name | Company's Opinion on a Shareholder's Request to Convene an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders |
| Date of occurrence | The Company's opinion on the request to convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, published on 15 June 2026, was disclosed on 16 June 2026. |
| Date recognized / date notice received | 11 June 2026 (the Company received a request to convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders dated 10 June 2026) |
| Subject Entity | SAAFホールディングス株式会社 |
| Cause | The Company considers that Mae (前)'s request seeks to make the election of more directors than the Company's prescribed number of directors (7) an agenda item for the general meeting of shareholders. The Tokyo District Court approved a decision provisionally determining that the director candidates proposed by Mae (前) do not hold the positions of director or representative director of the Company. |
| Type of litigation or proceeding | Application for a provisional disposition concerning confirmation of status and objection to the preservation order |
| Court or authority | Tokyo District Court |
| Date of filing / date of action | 2 June 2026 (decision on the provisional disposition); 10 June 2026 (decision rejecting the objection to the preservation order and approving the provisional disposition decision) |
| Outlook | The Company will carefully review the contents of the request, disclose its response policy once determined, and hold its 8th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on 29 June 2026. |
| Planned follow-up disclosure | The Company will disclose its response to this demand once its policy has been determined. |
Items this document does not state (15)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Tokyo District Court approved a decision on a provisional disposition stating that the 7 director candidates proposed by Mae (前) do not hold the positions of director or representative director of the Company, and indicated that the 7 existing directors purportedly removed at this extraordinary general meeting of shareholders continue to hold their positions as directors.