Decision and Details
Petition for a provisional disposition seeking confirmation that the 7 director candidates proposed by Mae (前氏) do not hold the positions of director or representative director of the Company
Because the plaintiffs in the action seeking rescission of the resolution (the action on the merits) are the directors and other parties, rather than the Company, the Company determined that the directors and other parties should also be the petitioners in the provisional disposition. The audit and supervisory board member's petition had the same content as the petition filed by the Company's directors.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Matter Covered | Petition for a provisional disposition seeking confirmation that the 7 director candidates proposed by Mae (前氏) do not hold the positions of director or representative director of the Company |
| Decision Date | Petition filed by the Company's directors: 21 May 2026; withdrawal of the previous petition: 21 May 2026; withdrawal of the audit and supervisory board member's petition: 20 May 2026 |
| Implementation Date | Petition filed by the Company's directors: 21 May 2026 (completed); previous petition: 21 May 2026 (withdrawn); audit and supervisory board member's petition: 20 May 2026 (withdrawn) |
| Quantity / scale | 7 director candidates proposed by Mae (前) |
| Reason | Because the plaintiffs in the action seeking rescission of the resolution (the action on the merits) are the directors and other parties, rather than the Company, the Company determined that the directors and other parties should also be the petitioners in the provisional disposition. The audit and supervisory board member's petition had the same content as the petition filed by the Company's directors. |
| Governing Rule | Laws, regulations, the Articles of Incorporation and other applicable rules |
| Related previous disclosures | Notice Regarding the Resolutions of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders and the Company's Response dated 12 May 2026 |
| Future plans | The Company will promptly make timely disclosures of any matters concerning the petition filed by the Company's directors that require disclosure. The final determination regarding the directors' status is expected to be made by the court. |
Items this document does not state (4)
These are items the company does not state in this document. We do not leave them blank, nor fill them in from other sources or by inference.
The reasons the company gives
The company's own explanation, not something inferred from the numbers.The Company determined that the directors and other parties, rather than the Company, should be the petitioners in the provisional disposition because the plaintiffs in an action seeking rescission of the resolution are the directors and other parties, not the Company. The audit and supervisory board member's petition was withdrawn because it had the same content as the petition filed by the Company's directors.