Hikari Food Service (138A) · RiskRestated
Damage to Brand Value Caused by Trademark Imitation
First written in FY2024. 1 of 2 entries say "Restated". Latest entry: FY2025.
2entries
2years
0from disclosures
How it moved
Same theme, other companies
Brand damage due to failure to protect trademarks and intellectual property rightsA theme 21 companies write about · 21 as a headwind · 0 as a tailwind
The whole theme swung hardest in 2023: 1 of 6 companies on the "Worse" side.
13 other companies' latest entry also says "Restated".
Ridges = years it wrote progress, valleys = years it wrote worse. Most hopeful companies at the back. Drag to turn, scroll to zoom, right-drag to pan. On a phone, two fingers turn and pinch to zoom; one finger scrolls the page.
Showing 14 of the 21 companies compared. The sentences above are computed from all 21.Full recordFilings, disclosures and news, newest first
- FY2025RestatedAnnual report
「We seek to protect our brand by obtaining and managing trademark rights for our brands.」
The company continues to disclose its policy of obtaining and managing trademark rights and the risk of brand-value impairment through imitation. - FY2024First statedAnnual report
「We seek to protect our brand by obtaining and managing trademark rights for our brands. However, if our intellectual property rights are infringed, for example through a third party's use of a similar trade name, and the value of our brand is impaired, this could affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.」
The company states its policy of obtaining and managing trademark rights and identifies the possibility of brand-value impairment from similar trade names used by third parties.